Mongols essays

Mongols essays Many documents give way to the Mongols way of life, their social order, and their war tactics. Most of the people whom them conquered saw them only as a ruthless and cruel society, whereas, the people living and working within the empire told of much tolerance and prosperity. The Mongols, whether seen as vicious conquerors or as a vast empire with much cultural diversity, caused many to seem them in different ways. In both the works of Marco Polo and Rashid al-Din the view of the Mongols was that they should be held in great esteem and that they had a great and vast empire. Marco Polo specifically talked of the great amounts of riches held within the kingdom. The quantity and richness of the plate... (Marco Polo) is just an example of how lavishly he described the region and its goods. He spoke of how efficient the road systems were and how easy travel was on them. The fact, though is, he probably had a slightly bias opinion because he was a high-ranking official of the Mongol court and it would look good for him to have writing of the wonders of the empire. The same bias is held true for Rashid al-Din who was a Persian historian but who was also a high official. He wrote about Chinggis Khans son, Ogedei. He praised him much throughout the account of him. Claiming that, He never neglected any measure designed to strengthen the framework of peace.... But, we must look at the works of B oth Marco Polo and Rashid and realize that they were written, probably to gain only for themselves in the mind of the emperor. There is still, though, probably some truth within them, but mostly it was elaborating on the positive aspects of the region or person, while pushing aside the negative. Taking a completely different turn though was the account by the Russians on the Mongol envisions. The Russians referred to them as the godless Tartars, showing their dislike for their lack of ...